Legal Opinion
State v. Woolman
Utah Supreme Court
Decided June 14, 1934No. 5453PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOFFAT, Justice.
The defendant and appellant, James Woolman, and others, were accused by the information in the cause of the crime of participating in a riot. The alleged riot it is charged occurred on the 23d day of February, 1933, at the City and County building in Salt Lake City, Utah, while the sheriff of the county in pursuance of his duty was holding a sale of real property. The appellant, James Woolman, alone stood trial upon the information.
Upon the trial to a jury, the defendant was found “guilty of the crime of participating in an unlawful assembly.”
The information upon which the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. TophamUtah Supreme Court · 1912
- State v. AndertonUtah Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. GesasUtah Supreme Court · 1916
- People v. O'loughlinUtah Supreme Court · 1881
- State v. DurfeeUtah Supreme Court · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. BakerUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Wilson v. SandstromSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
- State v. O'CONNORSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- Tomasso Bros. v. October Twenty-Four, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. WaidUtah Supreme Court · 1937
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.