Legal Opinion

State v. Erwin

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1941No. 6200PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADE, District Judge.

In this case the State of Utah prosecutes the defendants, E. B. Erwin, Harry L. Finch, R. O. Pearce, Frank A. Thacker and Ben Harmon, for a conspiracy to allow the violation of the anti-vice laws, on an indictment returned by the grand jury.

The defendant Ben Harmon died before the trial, and' Frank A. Thacker was acquitted by the jury. The other defendants were convicted and bring this appeal.

The allegations of the indictment material to this appeal are as follows:

“That the said E. B. Erwin, Harry L. Pinch * * * (and) R.. 0. Pearce * * * the said E. R. Erwin at all times…

2Cases cited122 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Hoag v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Garner v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. HoffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State of Oregon v. DeweyOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  5. State v. KerekesUtah Supreme Court · 1980

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API