Legal Opinion

State v. Hale

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1927No. 4612PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHansen, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of treating human ailments without a license, and appeals.

The charging part of the information upon which defendant was tried reads:

“That the said A. W. Hale between the 3rd day of June, 1926, and the 11th day of January, 1927, in the county of Cache, state of Utah, at said time not being licensed to treat human ailments without the use of drugs or medicine and without the use of operative surgery, did then and there treat human ailments without the use of drugs and medicine and without the use of operative surgery, and the said A. W. Hale did then and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. TophamUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State v. SheffieldUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  3. State v. PayUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State v. HobenUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  5. State v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. LeekUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Van Dam v. MorrisUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. LundUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State v. DurfeeUtah Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API