Commonwealth v. Thetonia
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.
The Commonwealth concedes that the finding of guilty by a judge must be set aside because the record does not reflect any colloquy between the judge and the defendant regarding her waiver of a jury trial. The concession is well taken. See Commonwealth v. Smith, 403 Mass. 489, 493 (1988).
The defendant was convicted under G. L. c. 272, § 7, as appearing in St. 1980, c. 409, of “deriv[ing] support or maintenance . . . from the earnings or proceeds of [a person’s] prostitution,” knowing the person to be a prostitute. She claims that as the statute is directed against pimping, her conduct did not…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Town of Lexington v. Town of BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. LightfootMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Commonwealth v. GrahamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. JasminMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TowersMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
- Commonwealth v. MatosMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
- Commonwealth v. PavaoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
- Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- Commonwealth v. AsmeronMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.