Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Thetonia

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 19, 1989No. 88-P-1379PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.

The Commonwealth concedes that the finding of guilty by a judge must be set aside because the record does not reflect any colloquy between the judge and the defendant regarding her waiver of a jury trial. The concession is well taken. See Commonwealth v. Smith, 403 Mass. 489, 493 (1988).

The defendant was convicted under G. L. c. 272, § 7, as appearing in St. 1980, c. 409, of “deriv[ing] support or maintenance . . . from the earnings or proceeds of [a person’s] prostitution,” knowing the person to be a prostitute. She claims that as the statute is directed against pimping, her conduct did not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Town of Lexington v. Town of BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. LightfootMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. GrahamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. JasminMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TowersMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  2. Commonwealth v. MatosMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. PavaoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  5. Commonwealth v. AsmeronMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API