State v. Simmington
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
When the judge of the municipal-county court adjudged that defendant had breached the conditions upon which execution was suspended, his remedy as now provided by G.S. 15-200.1, was by appeal.
But he contends that his complaint is not directed to the order placing him in custody and hence this statute is not applicable. He moved to vacate the conditions imposed, and it is from the order denying this motion that he seeks relief. The only method available to him for seeking a review of that order was by petition for writ of certiorari. So he asserts.
We may concede the correctness of his position…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pue v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- State v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Pue v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Leggett v. Southeastern People's College, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. CaudleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Dancer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1986
- In Re MarkhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Shore v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. DoughtieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.