Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 13, 1950No. 577PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarNhill, J.

Tbe cause was before the court below solely for review of the regularity and legality of the judgment of the county court invoking the original sentence. S. v. King, 222 N.C. 137, 22 S.E. 2d 241. Its judgment, in effect, was a dismissal of the writ for want of merit. It will be so treated.

The defendant did not object or except to the imposition of the condition, about which he now complains, at the time it was imposed. Nor did he appeal therefrom. By his conduct he impliedly consented thereto and committed himself to abide by the terms of the probation. S. v. Miller, 225 N.C. 213, 34 S.E. 2d…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. EverittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. State v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. State v. . HiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. State v. . PelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. State v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. CaudleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. ColeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. State v. SimmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. State v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API