Legal Opinion

Shore v. Edmisten

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 1, 1976No. 53PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

Judge Walker properly concluded that all fines must go to Guilford County for the use of the public schools and as to all but one of the judgments properly concluded that the payments ordered were indeed fines. As to one judgment (State v. Rogers, Exhibit HH) he erred in holding that the payment in question was a “fine” in the constitutional sense. We conclude, for reasons hereinafter stated, that the money ordered to be paid in the Rogers judgment was restitution properly payable to the Greensboro Police Department. Judge Walker’s judgment is to this extent modified and, as…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. GosbyWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. BickfordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Katzenstein v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  5. Southern Express Co. v. Commonwealth of VirginiaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. OsterlohSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Henry v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Dorothy M. Alexander v. Walter T. Johnson Jane G. Greenlee Joy J. Johnson Wymene Valand Henry W. Oxedine James WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  4. North Carolina School Boards Ass'n v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  5. State v. LocklearCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API