Shore v. Edmisten
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
Judge Walker properly concluded that all fines must go to Guilford County for the use of the public schools and as to all but one of the judgments properly concluded that the payments ordered were indeed fines. As to one judgment (State v. Rogers, Exhibit HH) he erred in holding that the payment in question was a “fine” in the constitutional sense. We conclude, for reasons hereinafter stated, that the money ordered to be paid in the Rogers judgment was restitution properly payable to the Greensboro Police Department. Judge Walker’s judgment is to this extent modified and, as…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. GosbyWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. BickfordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Katzenstein v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Southern Express Co. v. Commonwealth of VirginiaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. OsterlohSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Henry v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Dorothy M. Alexander v. Walter T. Johnson Jane G. Greenlee Joy J. Johnson Wymene Valand Henry W. Oxedine James WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- North Carolina School Boards Ass'n v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
- State v. LocklearCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.