Legal Opinion
Meyer v. Seifert
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 12, 1949No. 4-9018PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLeflar, J.
Appellant Gr. A. Meyer on behalf of himself and other property owners filed this bill in equity for a mandatory injunction to require the removal of a non-fireproof building- erected by defendants Seifert and Mahle, under a permit granted by the other defendants (City of Stuttgart, Ark., and the Mayor, City Clerk, and Aldermen of said city, in their official capacities) within a fire zone in which the erection of such buildings was prohibited by city ordinances. The Chancery Court refused to issue the injunction, and plaintiff appeals.
City Ordinances No. 277 and 386 of the City of Stuttgart…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Fitchette v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Rice v. Van VrankenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Fitzgerald v. Merard Holding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Van Hovenberg v. HolmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- State ex rel. Crow v. CantySupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- City of Las Vegas v. Cragin Industries, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Airlines Reporting Corp. v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- City of Harrison v. SnyderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- James v. JamesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Hickinbotham v. CorderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.