Rice v. Van Vranken
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
Plaintiffs and defendant each own parcels of improved real property in the same section of the city of Schenectady, closely adjacent, and all within the restricted zone where apartment houses are not permitted. On June 4, 1927, defendant obtained a permit to construct an apartment house at this location, and in November began operations. This suit is for an injunction.
In the same year a Zoning Ordinance was adopted. It was introduced at a council meeting on May seventeenth, adopted June seventh and became operative and effective on June twenty-third. For many months prior to the adoption it…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Buffalo v. . ChadeayneNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Matter of Fox Lane CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Fox Lane Corp. v. MannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- People Ex Rel. Publicity Leasing Co. v. . LudwigNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Empire City Subway Co. v. Broadway & S. A. RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- People v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Marcus v. Village of MamaroneckNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Town of Orangetown v. MageeNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Saveland Park Holding Corp. v. WielandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Wells v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.