Hickinbotham v. Corder
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Paul Ward, Associate Justice.
Involved is this question: Under what circumstances will a chancery court enjoin the violation of the penal provision of a city ordinance?
On July 9, 1956 the City of Little Bock enacted Ordinance No. 10206 which contains, among other provisions, the following which are pertinent to this case: Section 1 says it shall be unlawful for any person within the corporate limits of the city, on the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday, to open to the public any grocery store. Section 2 provides that any person violating the above provision shall be deemed guilty…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. VaughanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Meyer v. SeifertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. KarstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
- Lyric Theater v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hickinbotham v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- Union Pacific RR Co. v. State Ex Rel. Faulkner Cty.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- James v. JamesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Green Star Supermarket, Inc. v. StacySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Green Star Supermarket, Inc. v. StacySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.