Legal Opinion
Van Hovenberg v. Holman
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 18, 1940No. 4-5990PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGtriebin Smith, C. J.
The trial court refused to enjoin appellees from erecting and maintaining a filling station on the northeast corner of block 24, facing Beech at Seventh street in the city' of Texarkana, and property owners have appealed.
An ordinance (validity of which is not questioned) requires those proposing to “construct, erect, or operate”, a filling station to procure a permit from the municipality. Two ordinances applicable to filling stations were adopted under §§ 9589 and 9543 of Pope’s Digest, granting cities the power to prevent injury or annoyance, and also the right to- enact such ordinances…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sander v. BlythevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Bourland v. PollockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Pierce Oil Corp. v. City of HopeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Village of Altamont v. BaltimoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- Cumnock v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Meyer v. SeifertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Steward v. RustSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- James v. JamesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Arkansas State Board of Architects v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Bassett v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.