Legal Opinion
Pacific Scientific Co. v. Glassey
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 24, 1966No. Civ. 23168PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShoemaker, P. J.
Plaintiff Pacific Scientific Company (hereafter referred to as “Pacific”) brought this action against defendants Eugene Glassey and Exactel Instrument Company (hereafter referred to as “Exactel”) to recover damages for breach of a distributorship agreement.
The complaint alleged that on August 28, 1957, the parties entered into a written contract whereby plaintiff was to act as the exclusive distributor within a specified territory for the sale of certain products manufactured by defendants 1 and was to use its best efforts to promote the sale of such products; that plaintiff had performed its…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zinn v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Stott v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Nelson v. ReisnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Golden Gate Packing Co. v. Farmers' UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Snook v. PageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ramona Manor Convalescent Hospital v. Care EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- SCI California Furneral Services, Inc. v. Five Bridges FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Benard v. WalkupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Craig Taylor Equipment Co. v. Pettibone Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Dominium Management Services, Inc. v. Nationwide Housing GroupDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.