Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Reisner
California Supreme Court
Decided October 31, 1958No. L. A. 24457PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
Plaintiffs, M. C. Nelson and W. K. Dunne, brought an action for damages and an accounting against defendant, C. H. Reisner. Reisner cross-complained for damages. The trial court gave judgment for Reisner on plaintiffs’ complaint and in Ms favor for $30,6431on Ms cross-complaint. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment.
Plaintiffs were the owners of certain real property in Kern County. On June 17, 1947, plaintiffs, as lessors, entered into a written lease agreement with one Henry Schnaidt, whereby 160 acres were leased to him under what was called a ‘ ‘ development lease.” On February 1, 1949,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Overton v. Vita-Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Shoemaker v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Stott v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Ablett v. ClausonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Webb v. BraswellMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
- San Diego Watercrafts, Inc. v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Gherman v. ColburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Lewis Jorge Construction Management, Inc. v. Pomona Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Brandon & Tibbs v. George Kevorkian Accountancy Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.