Legal Opinion
Royal Ins. v. Bailey
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 13, 1929No. 5217PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.
This is an action upon a fire insurance policy in which the insurer defends principaEy upon the grounds: (1) That the poliey covered personal property which was incumbered by a chattel mortgage contrary to condition in the policy; (2) that the insured was not, at the time the poliey issued, the sole and unconditional owner of the property insured; and (3) that there had been a change, otherwise than by death of the insured, in the interest and title of the subject of the insurance, which terminated the risk.
After inspection of the premises to be insured by the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McMaster v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Royal Insurance v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins. v. B. S. Rhea & SonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
- Dolliver v. St. Joseph Fire & Marine InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Lancashire Insurance v. MonroeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Westchester Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Jones v. Commonwealth Mut. Fire Ins.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. v. HaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934