Legal Opinion

Dolliver v. St. Joseph Fire & Marine Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 25, 1880PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSoule, J.

The plaintiffs are the assignees in bankruptcy of Abraham Day, who, being the owner in fee of the buildings described in his policy, subject to certain mortgages and to a lease running for about three and one half years, obtained the policy sued on; and, the buildings having been destroyed by tire, bring this action to recover the amount for which they were insured. The plaintiffs were appointed assignees after the loss. The defendant contended, and the Chief Justice at the trial ruled, that the action could not be maintained, because no mention is made in the policy of the incumbrances on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hartford Fire Insurance v. WalshIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Commercial Insurance v. SpanknebleIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Willington v. GaleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
  4. Hutcheson v. BlakemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860
  5. Insurance Co. v. HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. US Bank National Association v. IbanezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  2. Delano v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. Loventhal v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. City of Boston v. Quincy Market Cold Storage & Warehouse Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Medley v. German Alliance InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API