Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. v. Haywood
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
From a judgment on a fire insurance policy jointly recovered by the appellees, the appellant insurer appeals. The appellee Haywood is the insured named in the policy, and by the standard mortgage clause attached thereto the loss was payable to “W. L. Dawson, mortgagee or trustee, as his interest may appear.”
The suit was defended on the ground that the assured was not the sole and unconditional owner in fee simple of the insured property, as he was required to be under the i erms of the policy; that Dawson was neither a mortgagee nor trustee, but simply an agent of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Concordia Ins. Co. of Milwaukee v. School Dist. No. 98 of Payne Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins. v. B. S. Rhea & SonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1918
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. MasseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Callen v. Massachusetts Protective Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bowling v. Illinois Bankers Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. SparksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935