Legal Opinion

Royal Insurance v. Martin

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 11, 1904No. 86PublishedCited by 75 opinions

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED "STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF PORTO RICO. The facts are stated in the opinion. This court has jurisdiction of this case.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED "STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF PORTO RICO. The facts are stated in the opinion. This court has jurisdiction of this case. Act establishing the government of Porto Rico, act of April 12, 1900; c. 191, 31 Stat. 85. The law determining the cases in which writs of error to and appeals from the Supreme Courts of the Territories of the United States may be taken, appears in the following statutes: Rev. Stat. § 702; act of March 3, 1885, c. 355, 23 Stat. 443; Circuit Court of Appeals act of March 3, 1891, c. 517, § 15, 26 Stat. 826, 828, and see Shute v.…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan

This was an action by the executor of the insured on a policy of insurance made by the Royal Insurance Company, a British corporation, whereby that company insured Francisco Martin against loss or damage by fire to the amount of seven hundred pounds on a certain building at. Coto Laurel, District of Ponce,' Porto Rico, and for nine hundred pounds on the stock in trade contained in such building.

The declaration alleged and the fact was not disputed that during the term of the. policy all the property insured was destroyed by fire. The case was tried by the court and a jury and a verdict was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Tayloe v. Merchants' Fire Ins. Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  3. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Knickerbocker Life Insurance v. PendletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Continental Nat. Bank of Memphis v. BufordSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. R. Ribas Y Hijo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Bernhard v. Rochester German InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  3. Stroehmann v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Garrozi v. DastasSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Flannagan v. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API