Legal Opinion
Jones v. Commonwealth Mut. Fire Ins.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 16, 1950No. Civ. Nos. 9325, 9327PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLMER, District Judge.
These are actions on policies of fire insurance. The cases were, tried together before the Court and without a jury. On the basis of the pleadings and the evidence produced at the trial, I make the following
Findings of Fact.
• 1. The plaintiff is a citizen of the State of Missouri.
2. Both defendants are Pennsylvania corporations and have their principal places of business in Pennsylvania.
3. Both defendants were authorized to do business in Pennsylvania only.
4. Commonwealth Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Pennsylvania (hereafter referred to as “Commonwealth”) issued its…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bulger v. Wilderman and PleetSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Western & A. Pipe Lines v. Home Ins., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County1891
- Harper v. Consolidated Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Harris v. Meyers (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- University City, Mo. v. Home Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Flynn v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Jones v. Protection Mut. Fire Ins. of CambriaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
- Compagnie Des Bauxites De Guinea v. Insurance Company Of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Compagnie Des Bauxites De Guineaa v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Booker Bros. v. American Casualty Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.