Legal Opinion
Image Technical Services, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 26, 1997No. Nos. 96-15293, 96-15296PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge BEEZER; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge GILLMOR.
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs-Appellees Image Technical Services, and ten other independent service organizations (“ISOs”) that service Kodak photocopiers and micrographie equipment sued the Eastman Kodak Co. (“Kodak”) for violations of the Sherman Act. The ISOs alleged that Kodak used its monopoly in the market for Kodak photocopier and micrographie parts to create a second monopoly in the equipment service markets. A jury verdict awarded treble damages totaling $71.8 million. The district court denied…
2Cases cited96 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SERVICE DELI INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- John Doe 1 v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Schor, Gary v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- In re Live Concert Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.