Legal Opinion
United States v. Microsoft Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 3, 2000No. Civil Action 98-1232 (TPJ), 98-1233 (TPJ)PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
JACKSON, District Judge.
The United States, nineteen individual states, and the District of Columbia (“the plaintiffs”) bring these consolidated civil enforcement actions against defendant Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) under the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2. The plaintiffs charge, in essence, that Microsoft has waged an unlawful campaign in defense of its monopoly position in the market for operating systems designed to run on Intel-compatible personal computers (“PCs”). Specifically, the plaintiffs contend that Microsoft violated § 2 of the Sherman Act…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Gravity Inc v. Microsoft CorpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- In re Microsoft Corporation Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Massachusetts v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- David Alibrandi, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Financial Outsourcing Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.