John Doe 1 v. Abbott Laboratories
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RYMER, Circuit Judge:
Do allegations of monopoly leveraging through pricing conduct in two markets state a claim under § 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2, absent an antitrust refusal to deal (or some other exclusionary practice) in the monopoly market or below-cost pricing in the second market? Following Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. Link-line Communications, Inc., — U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 1109, 172 L.Ed.2d 836 (2009), we hold that no such claim may be brought. As the district court held to the contrary, we reverse. 1
I
John Does 1 and 2 and the Service Employees International Union Health and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Nixon v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Aerotec International, Inc. v. Honeywell International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Tamara Diaz v. Kubler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- FTC v. Qualcomm IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Safeway Inc. v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011
- John D. Carson v. Monsanto CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.