American Economy Insurance v. Canamore
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*350EDMONDS, J.
This is a declaratory judgment action. Plaintiff appeals and defendants cross-appeal a judgment regarding defendants’ entitlement to benefits under two insurance policies. We affirm on appeal and on cross-appeal.
Plaintiff issued two insurance policies to defendant Canamore. One was an automobile liability policy that provided a $500,000 liability limit and $50,000 in uninsured/ underinsured (UM/UIM) benefits. The other was a multirisk, extra-liability, umbrella policy with a $1 million liability limit; it did not offer any UM/UIM benefits.
In May, 1988, Canamore was driving a car in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- White v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
3Cited by17 opinions
- United National Insurance v. DePrizioIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Insurance Co. of State of Pa. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Kromer v. Reliance InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INSURANCE CO. v. KeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Wright v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.