Legal Opinion

Wright v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 2001No. CC 16-96-05691; CA A95110; SC S45288PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*4GILLETTE, J.

This is an action against an insurer on a claim for damages incurred in connection with a fatal automobile accident. Plaintiffs are Robert and Shari Wright (the insureds), whose son died in the accident, and James R. Strickland, the personal representative of the son’s estate. Notwithstanding higher limits stated both in the insureds’ motor vehicle liability policy and their umbrella policy, the insurer, State Farm,1 refused to make any payment beyond the $25,000 minimum liability coverage required by the Oregon financial responsibility law. State Farm based its position on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. North Pacific Insurance v. HamiltonOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. American Economy Insurance v. CanamoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. Wright v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Clinical Research Institute v. Kemper Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. MERCURY INDEM. CO. OF ILLINOIS v. KimAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. Roberts v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. Medyanikov v. Continental InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Farmers Ins. Co. of Oregon v. MowryOregon Supreme Court · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API