MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INSURANCE CO. v. Key
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.
Defendants appeal from a summary judgment for plaintiff that declared the maximum amount of underinsured motorist benefits potentially available to defendants under a policy issued by plaintiff. We affirm.
Defendants, Veryl and Dale Key, were seriously injured in an automobile collision. The tortfeasor’s insurance policy had liability limits of $100,000 per person and $300,000 per accident. Defendants’ insurance policy, issued by plaintiff, provides uninsured/underinsured (UM/UIM) motorist protection with a liability limit of $300,000 per accident, which is known as a “single-limit” policy.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Peterson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- American Economy Insurance v. CanamoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- California Casualty Indemnity Exchange v. MaritzenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Yokum v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mutual of Enumclaw v. BoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. HaightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. GurleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Fox v. Country Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Grijalva v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.