Legal Opinion

Kromer v. Reliance Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 4, 1996PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a consolidated Declaratory Judgment Action in which the trial court entered a judgment in favor of appellees Reliance Insurance Company and Federal Insurance Company, and against appellants Leroy Kromer, Jr. and George J. Balikian. Appellants argue that Reliance’s excess-umbrella policy and Federal’s commercial excess policy are “motor vehicle liability insurance policies”, as defined by the 1984 Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law [“PMVFRL”] and, that they therefore, are required to provide uninsured and underinsured motorist…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. In re the Arbitration between Matarasso & Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Doto v. RussoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  4. Southern American Ins. Co. v. DobsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  5. St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. CorbettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Fisher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Insurance Co. of State of Pa. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  3. Abrohams v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance AgencyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Wisness v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. D'Adamo v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API