Kromer v. Reliance Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CAVANAUGH, Judge.
This is an appeal from a consolidated Declaratory Judgment Action in which the trial court entered a judgment in favor of appellees Reliance Insurance Company and Federal Insurance Company, and against appellants Leroy Kromer, Jr. and George J. Balikian. Appellants argue that Reliance’s excess-umbrella policy and Federal’s commercial excess policy are “motor vehicle liability insurance policies”, as defined by the 1984 Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law [“PMVFRL”] and, that they therefore, are required to provide uninsured and underinsured motorist…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- In re the Arbitration between Matarasso & Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Doto v. RussoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Southern American Ins. Co. v. DobsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. CorbettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Fisher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- Insurance Co. of State of Pa. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Abrohams v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance AgencyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Wisness v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- D'Adamo v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.