Johnson v. Howard
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Stearns, J., presiding, refusing a new trial, after verdict for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtCornell, J.
The order which is the subject of this appeal is as follows: “The defendant having moved for a new trial in this action upon the case therein allowed and settled, and the same having been submitted by the parties without argument, and the plaintiff consenting that'a pro-forma order be entered, without examination by the court: Ordered, that the said motion for a new trial be and the same is hereby denied.
“By the court,
“O. P. Stearns, Judge.
“Sept. 21, 1877."
It appears upon the face of the order that it was granted a long time after the decision in the case of Golvill v. Langdon, 22 Minn. 565,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Colvill v. LangdonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
3Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. Norris v. District Court First Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- State ex rel. Pope v. Germania BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Bock v. Sauk Center Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Carlson v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Cornish v. CoatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.