Legal Opinion

Colvill v. Langdon

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 29, 1876PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Goodhue county, Orosby, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Gileillan, C. J.1

Action for assault and battery upon the plaintiff, Jane E. By Laws 1869, ch. 58, amending Gen. St. ch. 66, § 29, a married woman may bring an action like this without joining her husband. Joining him in this case was an irregularity. But as the complaint clearly shows that the cause of action is in her alone, and as defendants could not be in any way prejudiced or embarrassed in their defence by the misjoinder, no substantial right is affected, and the court below might either disregard it or correct it at once by striking out the name of the husband.

The plaintiff, with her…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. SpragueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  2. State ex rel. Norris v. District Court First Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Johnson v. HowardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  4. Wiesner v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API