State ex rel. Norris v. District Court First Judicial District
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Certiorari issued October 5, 1892, to the District Court First Judicial District, Williston, J., to review proceedings taken against Michael Norris and Samuel Manice, relators, for contempt of court in ■disobeying a writ of injunction. Jacob E. Myers, Henry H. Myers and Benjamin F. Myers, three brothers, were in August, 1892, owners in fee of one undivided third ■of thirteen lots in Martin’s Division in Duluth.
Read the full summary
Certiorari issued October 5, 1892, to the District Court First Judicial District, Williston, J., to review proceedings taken against Michael Norris and Samuel Manice, relators, for contempt of court in ■disobeying a writ of injunction. Jacob E. Myers, Henry H. Myers and Benjamin F. Myers, three brothers, were in August, 1892, owners in fee of one undivided third ■of thirteen lots in Martin’s Division in Duluth. The Duluth Transfer Eailway Company surveyed and located its railway across these lots and employed the Calumet Construction Company to grade and ■complete its road. This Construction…
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
In proceedings at Stillwater, in Washington county, before the Hon. W. C. Williston, judge of the district court in and for the first judicial district, upon an order requiring the relators to show cause why they should not be punished for contempt of court, they were adjudged to be guilty of contempt, and fines were imposed therefor. By writ of certiorari the proceedings have been brought to this court for review. The proceedings to be reviewed, and the events connected with the acts of the relators, for which they were found guilty of contempt, may be thus stated:
An action was commenced in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kelly v. RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
- Jensen v. CrevierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Schulte v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Stevens v. McMillinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Coles v. BerryhillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Petraborg v. ZontelliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Flowers v. BartlettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Security State Bank v. BrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.