Bock v. Sauk Center Grocery Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Order of the supreme court directing the defendants to show cause why they should not be required to file a new supersedeas bond in their appeal from an order of the district court for Stearns county, Baxter, J., granting a motion for a temporary injunction.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
This action was commenced in the district court of the county of Stearns to prevent the carrying into effect of an alleged scheme by the defendants, as minority stockholders in a domestic corporation known as the “Sauk Center Grocery Company,” to obtain control of a majority of the capital stock of the corporation and of its property by a fraudulent issue of new stock.
The plaintiffs made a motion for a temporary injunction restraining the defendants, during the pendency of the action, from issuing, selling, delivering, or otherwise disposing of any of the capital stock of the corporation and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Draper v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Jerome v. McCarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Pratt v. Pioneer Press Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Railroad Co. v. SchutteSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Briggs v. SheaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Peterson v. BentleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Taylor Ditch Company, Inc. v. CareyWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
- Axford v. Western Syndicate Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Sisto v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.