Legal Opinion

Cornish v. Coates

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 18, 1903No. Nos. 13,613 — (148)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Benton county, Baxter, J., denying a motion to vacate and set aside a judgment theretofore entered in the action.

1Opinion of the Court

HER. CURIAM.

The defendants herein made a motion, which was brought on for hearing by order to show cause, to set aside an apparent judgment quieting the title to the land described in the complaint herein, on the ground that it was fraudulently entered without the authority of the court or knowledge of the defendants. On the hearing of the motion the plaintiff did not appear, but a purchaser of the land, the respondent Brown, appeared and opposed the motion. The trial ■court denied the motion, and the defendants appealed.

The first and only claim of the defendants necessary to be considered is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Geisberg v. O'LaughlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  2. Halvorsen v. Orinoco Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. Johnson v. HowardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Nelson v. AumanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. National Council of Knights & Ladies of Security v. RuderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API