Legal Opinion
Foremost Pro Color, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 23, 1983No. 80-5629PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Foremost Pro Color, Inc. (Foremost) appeals from the district court’s judgment for Eastman Kodak Co. (Kodak). The district court dismissed Foremost’s antitrust claims for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The court then granted Kodak’s motion for summary judgment on four of Foremost’s five breach of contract claims. After Foremost voluntarily dismissed the remaining contract claim, the district court entered final judgment for Kodak. We affirm.
I
Kodak is the preeminent firm in the amateur photographic industry in this country, enjoying a…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Rutman Wine Company v. E. & J. Gallo WineryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- New York Ex Rel. Schneiderman v. Actavis PLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Steamfitters Local Union No. 420 Welfare Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.