Legal Opinion

Paulsen v. Krumsick

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1948No. 7446PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLDEN, Justice.

It appears prior to April 20, 1945, respondent H. W. Krumsick and appellant Arthur Paulsen jointly operated a sawmill in Clearwater county; that during the operation of the mill plaintiff and appellant Paulsen advanced the sum of $18,480 to the joint venture; that, April 20th, appellant demanded an accounting and settlement and apparently, as a result of such demand, the following agreement was made .and entered into;

“Memorandum of Agreement
“This memorandum of agreement made .and entered into in duplicate this 20th day •of April, 1945, by and between Arthur Paulsen, a single…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. MacLeod v. StelleIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Stone v. BradshawIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Eastern Idaho Loan & Trust Co. v. BlombergIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Fox v. CosgriffIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Merchants' Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Globe Brewing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hixon v. AllphinIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Bell v. Idaho Finance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State Ex Rel. Robins v. ClingerIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Koehler v. StenersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Cooper v. Wesco Builders, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API