Legal Opinion

Koehler v. Stenerson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1953No. 7928PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PORTER, Chief Justice.

This is an action by respondents, plaintiffs below, to recover damages for alleged fraud in connection with a contract of purchase of a home to be built in Pocatello.. Respondents’ complaint was amended before and during the trial. It is lengthy and contains much repetitious and evidentiary matter. In order to properly present the questions involved in this, appeal, we deem it necessary to summarize the material parts of the amended complaint.

It is alleged in the amended complaint that I. S. Stenerson, doing business under the firm name of Builtrite Homes, and the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hooton v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Nelson v. HoffIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Weitzel v. JukichIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Smith v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Addy v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court · 1949

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McBride v. Ford Motor Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Nelson v. ArmstrongIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Jensen v. BledsoeIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Johnson v. NaugleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Bushong v. Kamiah Grain, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API