Legal Opinion

Hixon v. Allphin

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1955No. 8239PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Justice.

This is an action for restitution. The facts are set out in appellants’ amended complaint. It discloses that appellants, as husband and wife, purchased two milk routes designated 20 and 22 and operated them continually for several years prior to 1951, with the consent of the Ada County Dairymen’s Association, for whom the routes were operated. Appellants collected all milk within the routes from member-producers and furnished their own hauling equipment and paid their own expenses. They received compensation at a stipulated rate per pound for milk hauled. The hauling…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Matarese v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Bill v. GattavaraWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Stone v. BradshawIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
  4. McShane v. QuillinIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  5. State of Arizona v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Acequia, Inc. v. Clinton (In re Acequia, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. Franks v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  3. Continental Forest Products, Inc. v. Chandler Supply Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Connecticut National Bank v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  5. Interform Co. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API