Legal Opinion

Bell v. Idaho Finance Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1953No. 7903PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, District Judge.

General Demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint was sustained without disclosure of reason and without application or leave to amend. Plaintiff has appealed from the consequent judgment of dismissal.

Plaintiff asserts he paid usurious interest to the defendant, finance company assignee of 'conditional sale contract, and accordingly seeks to recover the statutory penalty of the amount paid “plus twice the amount” of such interest, section 27-1907 Idaho Code. He alleges that on November 9, 1948, he purchased an automobile from the McCormick Used Cars under conditional sale…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Stearns v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Commercial Credit Co. v. TarwaterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Hogg v. RuffnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  4. Hafer v. SpaethWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Verbeck v. ClymerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. J. C. Penney Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Meridian Bowling Lanes, Inc. v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Freedman v. HendershottIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Rangen, Inc. v. Valley Trout Farms, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Irwin Rogers Insurance Agency, Inc. v. MurphyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API