Legal Opinion

Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 24, 1966No. A.R.D. 205; Entry Nos. 36022; 37281PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donlon, Judge:

This is an application for review of the decision of the trial judge, holding that appellant (plaintiff below) had failed to prove the amount of the export value which it claims for this merchandise. Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United States, 54 Cust. Ct. 600, Reap. Dec. 10942. There is no allegation of error in the findings of the trial judge that export value is the proper basis for appraise*793ment and that the applicable law is section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1980, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

The merchandise consists of cotton hooked rugs, 19 by 29 inches…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Byrnes v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  3. United States v. ByrnesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  4. West End Auto Wrecking Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ellis Silver Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Concord Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  3. F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. Karl Schroff & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  5. H. M. Young Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API