Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Donlon, Judge:
This is an application for review of the decision of the trial judge, holding that appellant (plaintiff below) had failed to prove the amount of the export value which it claims for this merchandise. Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United States, 54 Cust. Ct. 600, Reap. Dec. 10942. There is no allegation of error in the findings of the trial judge that export value is the proper basis for appraise*793ment and that the applicable law is section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1980, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.
The merchandise consists of cotton hooked rugs, 19 by 29 inches…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Byrnes v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
- United States v. ByrnesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
- West End Auto Wrecking Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ellis Silver Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Concord Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Karl Schroff & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- H. M. Young Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.