Legal Opinion

F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 16, 1968No. A.R.D. 239; Entry No. C 16886PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORD, Judge:

This application for review was filed by the importer against the decision and judgment of the trial judge in a reappraisement proceeding which was reported in F. B. Vandegrift & Co., Inc. v. United States, 56 Cust. Ct. 715, R.D. 11169.

The merchandise involved herein consists of two kinds of linoleum which were appraised on the basis of export value as said value is *966defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by tbe Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 91 Treas. Dec. 295, T.D. 54165. Tbe importer-appellant herein does not contest tbe basis of appraisement, export…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Acme Steel Co.United States Customs Court · 1963
  2. Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. Acme Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  5. Independent Cordage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. Luckytex, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. United States v. Thomas P. Gonzalez Corp.United States Customs Court · 1971
  4. Dushoff Distributing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. Jaime Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API