Legal Opinion

H. M. Young Associates, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 2, 1968No. R.D. 11517; Entry Nos. 569718; 575549-1/2; 585303-1/2PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Chief Judge:

The three appeals for reappraisement listed above, which have been consolidated for purposes of trial, relate to several importations of elastic waistband material exported from West Germany during May and June 1965. This merchandise was invoiced and entered at 62 cents per yard, f.o.b. port of exportation. Appraisement was made upon the basis of constructed value as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, at 98 cents per yard, net, packed.

It is the contention of plaintiff that the proper basis…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. BrechnerUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. United States v. Supreme Merchandise Co.United States Customs Court · 1962
  3. United States v. Gitkin Co.United States Customs Court · 1961
  4. Valley Knitting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  5. United States v. Berben Corp.United States Customs Court · 1962

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. H. M. Young Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. United States v. Thomas P. Gonzalez Corp.United States Customs Court · 1971
  4. Picker Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  5. Majestic Electronics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API