Byrnes v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Donlon, Judge:
The merchandise at issue is fishhooks, exported from England, which were entered at Seattle at various times between March 3, 1958, and December 17, 1959. Four suits for reap-praisement of the merchandise have been consolidated for purposes of trial.
There is no serious controversy as to facts. Proofs of record include the official papers; a stipulation which was entered into on trial; the affidavit (introduced by plaintiff) of one David J. Sealey, identified as the sales director in Eedditch, England, of Edgar Sealey & Sons, Ltd., manufacturer of the merchandise, which affidavit…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Alfred Kohlberg, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1939
- Acme Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- United States v. Tiffany & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
- Walter v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
3Cited by11 opinions
- Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- United States v. F. W. Myers & Co.United States Customs Court · 1969
- United States v. ByrnesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
- Luckytex, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Pan American Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.