Legal Opinion

Gaskill v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1969No. 693SC529PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

A customer entering a store during business hours attains the status of an invitee of the proprietor. Morgan v. Tea Co., 266 N.C. 221, 145 S.E. 2d 877. This relationship, however, does not make the proprietor an insurer of his customers’ safety while on his premises. Routh v. Hudson-Belk Co., 263 N.C. 112, 139 S.E. 2d 1. Any liability on the part of the proprietor for injuries suffered by his customers attaches only for such injuries as result from his actionable negligence. Lee v. Green & Co., 236 N.C. 83, 72 S.E. 2d 33. The proprietor does owe to his customers the duty to exercise ordinary…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Raper v. McCRORY-McLELLAN CORPORATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Hinson v. Cato's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Powell v. DEIFELLS, INCORPORATEDSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Morgan v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Faircloth v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1993
  2. Gladstein v. South Square AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. ADM Milling Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Stafford v. Food World, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Hill v. Allied Supermarkets, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API