Legal Opinion

Hill v. Allied Supermarkets, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 31, 1979No. 7826SC739PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

That a store proprietor is not an insurer of the safety of customers on his premises and that liability for injury suffered by a customer in his store attaches only for such injuries as result from actionable negligence on his part “is a principle of the law of negligence so familiar and so firmly established as almost to obviate the necessity of citing supporting authority.” Long v. Food Stores, 262 N.C. 57, 59, 136 S.E. 2d 275, 277 (1964); see Annot., 62 A.L.R. 2d 6 (1958). The proprietor does owe to his customers the duty to exercise ordinary care to maintain in a reasonably…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hinson v. Cato's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Long v. National Food Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Pratt v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Gaskill v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Dawson v. Carolina Power & Light CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Roumillat v. Simplistic Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Douglas v. Great Atlantic & Pac. Tea Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Thurlow v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  4. Elston v. Circus Circus Mississippi, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2005
  5. Nourse v. Food Lion, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API