Hinson v. Cato's, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
A store owner does not insure his patrons against slipping or falling upon the floor. Raper v. McCrory-McLellan Corp., 259 N.C. 199, 130 S.E. 2d 281. The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur does not apply in such cases. Skipper v. Cheatham, 249 N.C. 706, 107 S.E. 2d 625. To hold the owner liable, the injured person must show: (1) that the owner negligently created the condition causing the injury, or (2) that it negligently failed to correct the condition after notice, either express or implied, of its existence. The mere fact that one slips and falls on a floor does not constitute evidence of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Raper v. McCRORY-McLELLAN CORPORATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Skipper v. CheathamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Barnes v. Hotel O.Henry Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Berger v. CornwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
3Cited by32 opinions
- Roumillat v. Simplistic Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Rappaport v. Days Inn of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Faircloth v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1993
- Herring v. Food Lion, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Byrd v. ArrowoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.