Legal Opinion

H. Roy Berry Co. v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1925No. 16634. Judgment reversed; award set asidePublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DeYoung

Raymond Brooks, twenty-one years of age, unmarried and with no dependents, applied to the Industrial Commission for the adjustment of a claim for compensation arising out of an injury which occurred on August 27, 1923, while in the employ of the H. Roy Berry Company, a corporation. The company was engaged in the business of subdividing and selling real estate as agent for owners. While preparing a twenty-acre farm near the city of Park Ridge, in Cook county, for subdivision, it was found expedient to tear down an old barn which was situated on the land. The company employed Raymond Grunder, a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Uphoff v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Hahnemann Hospital v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Matter of Bargey v. . Massaro MacAroni Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Aurora Brewing Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Chicago Cleaning Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. W. J. Newman Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Rumley v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Dillard v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Hernandez v. Border Truck LineNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Karos v. OcenasWyoming Supreme Court · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API