Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Littlefield
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided November 6, 2000No. 25210PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
343 S.C. 212 (2000)
540 S.E.2d 81
Ex Parte Horace LITTLEFIELD and Jimmy Jeter, Petitioners.
In Re The State of South Carolina, Respondent,
v.
Jack Williams, Respondent.
No. 25210.
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Heard September 20, 2000.
Decided November 6, 2000.
David L. Thomas, of Wilson, Moore, Taylor & Thomas, P.A., of Greenville, for petitioners.
Solicitor Robert M. Ariail and Assistant Solicitor Mindy L. Hervey, of Greenville County Solicitor's Office, for respondent The State of South Carolina.
Cheryl Aaron, of Greenville, for respondent Jack Williams.
WALLER, Justice:
Horace Littlefield and Jimmy…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. ThriftSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Plum Creek Development Co. v. City of ConwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- State v. NeedsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Willimon v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
- In the Interest of Lyde v. Dept. of Soc. Serv.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. CurtisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- State v. CaseyUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Taghivand v. Rite Aid Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
- Sanford v. South Carolina State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- State v. PeakeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.