Legal Opinion

Plum Creek Development Co. v. City of Conway

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 25, 1999No. 24886PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Justice:

We granted Plum Creek Development Company, Inc.’s (Plum Creek’s) petition for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in Plum Creek v. The City of Conway, 828 S.C. 347, 491 S.E.2d 692 (Ct.App.1997). We affirm as modified.

In November 1991, Plum Creek acquired property for a residential development. Respondent The City of Conway (City) refused to provide water and sewer service to the development unless it was annexed.

In 1992, Plum Creek petitioned the lower court for a writ of mandamus to require City to provide water and sewer service for the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hilton Head Center of South Carolina, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Curlee v. HowleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  3. Griggs v. GriggsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  4. REIDMAN CORP. v. Greenville Steel Structures, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  5. Willimon v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Sunrise Corp. of Myrtle Beach v. City of Myrtle BeachCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  2. Charleston Lumber Co. v. Miller Housing Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Judy v. JudySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Toney v. LaSalle Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2012
  5. Ex Parte LittlefieldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API