Willimon v. City of Greenville
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, Chief Justice.
This appeal is from a writ of mandamus issued by the Honorable James A. Spruill directing that the City of Greenville and its officers comply with Section 47-1327, Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1962.
Respondent, Mary R. Willimon, owns a tract of land at the intersection of Highway 276 and Highway 291 within the City of Greenville upon which is erected a filling station. At the time Respondent acquired this property, in November, 1947, said filling station had access to both north and southbound traffic from Highway 291 and east and westbound traffic from Highway 276. It…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Port Royal Mining Co. v. HagoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1889
- Paris Mountain Water Co. v. City Council of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
- Garraux v. City Council of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
- Gibson v. GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
- Bland v. City Council of SumterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Plum Creek Development Co. v. City of ConwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Charleston County School District v. Charleston County Election CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- RIVERWOODS, LLC v. County of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Redmond v. Lexington County School District No. FourSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Ex Parte LittlefieldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.