Legal Opinion

State v. Curtis

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 5, 2004No. 25762PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice WALLER:

Kenneth Curtis was convicted of two counts of the sale of urine with the intent to defraud a drug or alcohol test, in violation of S.C.Code Ann. § 16-13-470 (2003). We affirm.

PACTS

In 1994, Curtis started a business known as Privacy Protection Services (PPS) which sells urine substitution kits to individuals. The kits contain urine, a pouch, a tube, a hand-warmer device, duct tape, a pen, instructions for use, two business cards and a “Notice.” The instructions advise how to use the heat pack to maintain proper temperature, how to affix the kit to the body for “maximum…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Curtis v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. BurdetteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. HoffmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. ByramSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. State v. McKnightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. GentrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. State v. FreiburgerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  3. State v. ZeiglerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  4. State v. StanleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  5. State v. CopeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API