Harrison v. Cook

BISHOP, J. pro tem. *

Defendant Homer Cook has appealed from that provision of the judgment that denied him any relief on his cross-complaint and also from those provi sions of the judgment that tied his hands so that in the future he can never make any use of the five promissory notes that were the main basis of his cross-complaint. We have concluded that because of his breach of the contract of which the promissory notes were an integral part, the judgment was proper and should be affirmed.

This is a judgment roll appeal and we gather the facts partly from those agreed upon in the pretrial…