Legal Opinion
Bergum v. Weber
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 20, 1955No. Civ. 21147PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOURSE (Paul), J. pro tem. *
Plaintiff Bergum appeals from a judgment of the trial court dismissing this action after the defendant’s general demurrer to the second amended complaint had been sustained without leave to amend.
By his second amended complaint plaintiff seeks to enjoin defendant from future unfair competition and to recover damages sustained because of such alleged acts by defendant in the past.
The facts alleged in the second amended complaint, which we must accept as true, may be summarized as follows: For many years prior to December 31, 1952, plaintiff and defendant had been…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Nelson v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Tanner v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Stockton Dry Goods Co. v. GirshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bicycle Transit Authority, Inc. v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Harm v. FrasherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Smith v. BullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Nye v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
- Masonite Corp. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.