Legal Opinion
Schwartz v. Family Dental Group, P.C.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 8, 2008No. AC 27880PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The defendants, Family Dental Group, P.C., Peter Munk and Family Dental Group-Clinton Associates, appeal from the judgment of the trial court granting the application by the plaintiff, Steven Schwartz, for injunctive relief to restore his partnership status. The dispositive issues on appeal are whether § 12 (a) (i) in the partnership agreement is enforceable, and, if so, whether such provision permits termination of one of the partner’s association with the partnership “without cause,” as long as ninety days notice is given. We conclude that the provision is enforceable…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tallmadge Bros. v. Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Konover Development Corp. v. ZellerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Ramirez v. Health Net of the Northeast, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Holly Hill Holdings v. LowmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Enviro Express, Inc. v. AIU InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Geysen v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Chioffi v. MartinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Leichter v. Lebanon Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Mujo v. Jani-King Int'l, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
- Coppola Construction Co. v. Hoffman Enterprises Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.